Slowest song in magic tiles 31/2/2023 This is why the slow loading Gmail interface has a loading screen so it is perceptibly doing something rather than appearing to be frozen. Response times greater than 10 seconds completely lose the user’s attention. Response times of 1 second or less are fast enough for users to feel they are interacting freely with the information. > A response time of 100ms is perceived as instantaneous. It took 10 seconds in either browser to load the "modern" javascript gmail view.įor reference this is about 7 times slower than the html view or 50 times slower than mu4e. Loading the old school plain interface html interface to gmail took aprox 1.5 seconds. Logically there is some time required to render the view but its quite small and challenging to measure so lets say aprox 200ms or 1/5th of a second. Running mu find maildir:/Gmail/INBOX took 9 ms this is easy to measure as it happens in the terminal.Ĭreating an emacsclient frame takes about 150ms added to the mu query which takes about 9. Lets compare that to other local ways of accessing email. In each I then entered and measured the time between hitting enter and seeing what looked like a usable interface. In both cases I opened and then closed gmail to ensure what could be cached was cached. In both cases I was logged into my google account. On a dual core cpu from 2014 with an ssd running linux I opened first firefox 70 and then chrome 75. Subjectively others view gmail as slow and you view it as fast. I could go on, but I feel like an old man shouting into the void. If I swipe the card down and then tap the map to try to get a better view of the restaurant's location, I lose the location indicator on the restaurant and the map re-centers on my current location. I already knew what a pizza looks like, but I still don't know where the restaurant is. I just searched for "pizza" and tapped the first result and got a large picture of a pizza. If I search for a place and tap a result, I get a full-screen card with information about that place, but no map. Like the "Explore" card, this seems to be screaming "look what we can do!", but it ignores what I want to do, which is navigate using the bird's-eye paradigm that has been used by every other map since the dawn of cartography. If I so much as brush the screen with more than one finger, it enters its 3D map mode. The card is useless 95% of the time, but obscures half of the map, which is what I want to see and is so important as to be the name of the application. Even when I'm somewhere else, my primary use of the app is to get directions to an _already determined_ destination. I am usually at my suburban house, near which there is nothing worth exploring. The app always loads with an "Explore " card that takes half the screen. I spend so much time fighting with the UI to try to just see a map: My problem is with the "featurite", which I humbly disagree is getting better. The maps load pretty quickly for me (satellite data on the desktop is another story, for some reason).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |